Ethics of physician dating former patient Freeonlineadultchat


04-Jun-2020 17:29

The penalty of revocation is “appropriate and necessary to protect the public and ensure that public trust in the profession is maintained and that public trust in the regulator is maintained,” college lawyer Elisabeth Widner told the five-member panel Wednesday.

Ghabbour’s case comes as the provincial government is looking to strengthen the law around sexual abuse and physician-patient relationships in the wake of a Star investigation.

Should a psychiatrist who began dating his patient shortly after they stopped seeing each other professionally be allowed to keep his licence?

That’s the question before a discipline panel of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, which must determine if Toronto doctor Nagi Ghabbour should become the first physician in the province to have his licence yanked for becoming romantically involved with a former patient too soon after the end of the doctor-patient relationship.

Under proposed legislation, known as Bill 87, announced last year a person is still considered a “patient” for the purpose of the new rules for one year after they stop seeing the physician.

Therefore, any sexual activity within that year would be considered sexual abuse and lead to the mandatory revocation of a doctor’s licence.

Thus, physicians should routinely monitor their own Internet presence to ensure that the personal and professional information on their own sites and, to the extent possible, content posted about them by others, is accurate and appropriate.

(c) If they interact with patients on the Internet, physicians must maintain appropriate boundaries of the patient-physician relationship in accordance with professional ethical guidelines, just as they would in any other context.

ethics of physician dating former patient-4

Web cam chat xxx

The woman had been experiencing stress at work as well as marital difficulties, and was seeing Ghabbour for anxiety and depression. She began displaying romantic feelings for him in sessions in early 2015, which he testified he resisted.“I do not disagree with the proposition that penalties can and should change over time, but they should be incremental and proportional,” Veel told the panel.